![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sorting Cows for More Efficient Winter Supplemental
Feeding Dr. Glenn Selk, Oklahoma State University Emeritus Extension
Animal Scientist Cow calf producers in the Southern Plains are searching for every management
strategy that will improve the efficiency of the feeding program for their cow
herds. Drought-shortened pastures and reduced and/or expensive hay
supplies mean that feed wastage must be eliminated. Putting just the right
amount of forage and supplement in front of the cows according to their needs
will be most important this winter. First calf heifers have historically been the toughest females on the ranch
to get rebred. They are being asked to continue to grow, produce milk,
repair the reproductive tract, and have enough stored body energy (fat) to
return to heat cycles in a short time frame. Two-year old cows must fill
all of these energy demands at a time when their mouth is going through the
transition from baby teeth to adult teeth. If these young cows are pastured with the larger, older cows in the herd,
they very likely will be pushed aside when the supplements are being fed in the
bunk or on the ground. The result of these adverse conditions for young
cows very often is a lack of feed intake and lowered body condition. Of
cour! se, lowered body condition in turn results in delayed return to heat
cycles and a later calf crop or smaller calf crop the following year. North Dakota State University data of commercial cow herds recorded over a 21 year period illustrated the differences in size and body condition of very young cows and the very mature (10 year old+) cows. The North Dakota data clearly showed that the average 2 year old is about 20% smaller than her full grown herd mates. There is little wonder that the younger cows get pushed away from feed bunks, hay racks, or supplements fed on the ground. The results of the size differences and the need to continue to grow are manifest in the lower body condition scores noted in the very young cows. The very old cows are experiencing decline in dental soundness that make it difficult for them to maintain feed intake and therefore body condition. Over the 21 year data set from North Dakota, the 2-year old cows and the 11 year-old and older were significantly lower (0.3 or more units) in body condition score than middle-age cows. Consequently, it makes sense to sort very young cows with the very old cows
(if not already culled) and provide them with a better
opportunity to compete for the feed supplies. By doing so, the rancher can
improve the re-breeding percentages in the young cows and keep the very old cows
from becoming too thin before culling time. From this data they formulated three
logical groups of cows to be pastured together for feeding efficiency: Group 1: The two-year old first calf heifers. They have higher
nutrient needs than other cows that are not growing. They are too small to
compete with larger, older, boss cows for the supplement. Group 2: The old cows (10 years and older) and the 2nd calf heifers. In
addition, this group should include any of the middle aged cows that were thin
and needed extra supplement. Cows that were Body Condition Score 4 or less
would be considered. Group 3: The remaining cow herd. This is the group that is mature
in size and in adequate condition to enter the winter feeding period as at least
Body Condition Score 5. If only two groups are possible, putting groups 1 and 2 together would be the
logical other combination. Ranchers, then want to be certain that the
feeding program is adequate to have cows in each group calve as BCS 5 or 6 next
spring. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||